Schools

New School Year, New Pledge of Allegiance?

In just a few short weeks, thousands of kids will head back to school and that begs the question, "Should kids be required to say the Pledge of Allegiance daily?"

When students head back to the classroom in just a few weeks, they'll start each day with the Pledge of Allegiance — a tradition that goes back generations.

In Wisconsin, as is the case with most states, classrooms in public schools are required to offer the pledge or the National Anthem daily, but students are not required to actually stand up and recite it. Most do, of course, but some students object to the phrase "Under God" and refuse to take part in the daily routine.

Students are required to say the pledge, but should they be? Patch posed the question to users over the last few days and received a flurry of feedback.

Find out what's happening in Muskegowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"If you live, breathe, work and are educated in America, you owe your allegiance to America," Carolyn Tyler wrote on the Greenfield Patch Facebook page. "There were more loving, kind, patriotic people when we grew up reciting the pledge of allegiance who respected their parents, their community, their schools and humanity. What's wrong with it? How could reciting the pledge harm anyone? America - Honor and love it or leave it!"

"I don't want my kids to have to say anything," Chris Wenger wrote on the Oak Creek Patch Facebook page. "I would hope they would WANT to make the decision to say it on their own."

Find out what's happening in Muskegowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The issue has surfaced nationally. Earlier this year, a state lawmaker in Arizona introduced a bill to require students to recite the pledge. Other states, including Oregon and Nebraska, have had discussions on whether to require the pledge to be recited in schools.

For three decades, the pledge read as it does today, without the controversial phrase, “Under God.” But in 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower pushed for Congress to add the phrase to combat communist threats, leaving Americans with the 31-words we have today:

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

So, should students be required to recite it?

"My kids do in Oak Creek," Becky O'Brien wrote. "More schools would if they took God out of it. Restore it to the original pledge and there wouldn't be a problem. It was written without the word God for a reason. This country wasn't built on religion."

"As in forced to do so? No," Steve Morschauser wrote. "That would run contrary to the very concept behind the basis of our country. Freedom can be painful for some to watch and ponder."

Patch blogger Lyle Ruble opened up this heated discussion of saying the pledge in a blog post that garnered more than 250 comments back in December.

“Only the discussion of abortion gets more emotive attention; but the role of religion in our schools and classrooms has been a sure fire prescription for heated conflict,” Ruble wrote.

And those comments ran the same lines we see eight months later – strong patriotism as well as a desire for separation of church and state. 

“But where does it end? There are so many religions and denominations  At what point does the gov. say, "Enough - there aren't enough hours in the day or room in the yard for all of this," FreeThoughtTroy wrote.

"Let's all pretend that religion does not exist, that is the way to educate our children about tolerance," Patch reader, Greg, commented. "I could walk into any school and find or hear 10 things that I could say offend me. It is time to tell the eternally offended to get bent. Grow up, suck it up and be a good example."

"We cannot deny our heritage that this country was founded by people who mostly believe in a God --- although many Christians are wrong to think that it was founded as a Christian society, as most of the Founders seem to have been Deists. God is a generic word -- and it can have many meanings. The only people who can object to even this generic term would be Atheists, who insist there is No God, in any way, shape or form..." reader David Tatarowicz posted. 


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here