Fireworks Continues to Spark Debate

Made more concerning by the recent hot and dry weather, residents protest permits for anyone in the city.

Tom Templin, a retired firefighter and Muskego resident, told the city's finance committee Tuesday that its current fireworks ordinance is "foolhardy" and that the city needed a "wakeup call" because he believes no fireworks should be allowed in the city.

Initially, Templin appeared to ask the committee to rescind the fireworks application of neighbors Randall Bruch and Jason Geiger. The area where they live, which is situated off of Hillendale and Field Drive, is fairly wooded, with a wetland area that has been dry given the lack of rain, and that had Templin concerned.

"Did you see the brush fire in Burlington, which burned about 80 acres? They had great difficulty getting to it. They had to get on ATVs just to find the area," he said. "This is the type of area we're talking about — it's not an area you sould be playing with fire at all — it's a tinderbox there."

Mayor Kathy Chiaverotti said the decision had not been made yet as to whether the city would initiate a burning or fireworks ban, but was "considering it along with the assistance of the fire chief."

However, the committee stressed that once a permit was approved, unless there were any violations or complaints existing, it could not legally be revoked. That's not the response Templin was looking for.

"The city of Muskego should take a long, hard look at its ordinance because it makes no common sense. I don't know why there are any fireworks allowed in this city, as many others don't allow it," he argued.

Alderman Dan Soltysiak explained the current ordinance already does address issues of wind speed and direction, the need for firefighting equipment and supervision, and that "there's nothing that allows us to be proactive in preventing a violation. We can't refuse a permit based on something that might happen."

He added: "it's important as well for everyone taking out a permit to know they are responsible for anything that can happen."

Templin was told that going forward further amendments to the ordinance could help to tighten up the restrictions in the ordinance, but no immediate change could be made.

It may have been a small consolation, as Templin's wife Linda explained that she "was on edge and nervous the last Fourth of July, hearing the fireworks go off and knew that there would be no way the (Fire Department) could get to it in time."

Templin told the committee that he would take the opportunity to address the ordinance for the coming year, but in the meantime he "would not be going to any fireworks on the 3rd or 4th of July. I'll be staying home with a garden hose."

Denise Konkol June 27, 2012 at 02:14 PM
Denise Konkol June 27, 2012 at 02:17 PM
Ald. Soltysiak made a good point that the class C fireworks that launch are generally safer because they fizzle out (or are designed to) by the time they land. Sparklers and groundworks because they're in direct contact with grass are worse. Comparatively, I'm being told Muskego looks in far better shape because of the rain we had about 10 days ago, which was heavy. Mine is still mostly green, but it can't take much more.
Daniel Fifield June 27, 2012 at 07:43 PM
Personally I enjoy the relaxed ordinance around fireworks in the City of Muskego, but that being said. There needs to be some common sense when we have dry conditions like this year. We should consider modify the ordinance to allow revoking of permits if the conditions warrant it.
Steven Klinko June 27, 2012 at 10:38 PM
what What?
Muskegotom June 28, 2012 at 01:14 PM
I agree with Templin. Fireworks should be banned in the city.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »