.
Feedback

Text of Gov. Scott Walker's Budget Address

Below is the speech the governor delivered to the Legislature Tuesday afternoon.

Speaker Fitzgerald, Speaker Pro Tem Kramer, President Ellis, Majority Leader Fitzgerald, Minority Leader Barca, Supreme Court Justices, Constitutional Officers, tribal leaders, members of the Cabinet, distinguished guests, members of the Legislature, and most importantly, fellow citizens of Wisconsin.

Each and every one of us gathered in the chamber today hold a diverse set of beliefs – beliefs that we are passionate about sharing - and that serve to guide our actions. Each of us has a vision for a better tomorrow in Wisconsin. 

But we all share something in common -- an unrivaled passion for this state and the people who call it home.  We all want Wisconsin to be the very best that it can be.  Yet, -- because our experiences are unique and our beliefs diverse -- our paths may diverge as we tackle today’s challenges.  But even at the height of our differences, we can and must keep our promise to people of Wisconsin that they will always come first.         

Democracy does not just expect differences, it demands them.  It’s the manner in which we discuss and resolve those differences that leads to bold solutions and innovative reforms.  I ask that we continue to be mindful of our differences – as well our similarities – in the coming days, weeks and months.  Above all, let us not lose sight of the fact that we were each elected to represent the people of this state by participating in our democratic process.

I applaud the State Assembly and those in the State Senate who are here today for not losing sight of that.

Over the past few weeks, a great deal of attention has been focused on Wisconsin.  That’s ok because freedom thrives each time there is a passionate debate in our society.  Passion and civility can go hand-in-hand and that’s what’s on display here in Wisconsin.  

But outside observers need to know that there is more to this state as well.  Wisconsin is filled with outstanding workers and multi-generational employers.  We have tremendous resources and amazing attractions.  Most importantly, we have decent people in this state. 

The good people of this state come from all walks of life – young and old, urban and rural, Democrat and Republican. 

Recently, I learned of yet another story that affirms that sense of decency. 

Some of our state employees at the Farm Center spent time with two brothers who jointly operate a dairy farm that was – literally - on the verge of financial collapse.  One of the brothers was so stressed that he was considering some horrible options. 

The Farm Center staff calmly walked the brothers through a variety options and got them through their immediate crisis.  That day, our public employees not only helped someone’s life, they may have actually helped save someone’s life. 

This story says a lot about the people of Wisconsin. 

It certainly reinforces the financial strain that so many are experiencing across the state.  Without a doubt, it shows the compassion of our people toward their fellow citizens.  And it shows the professionalism of our public employees who really care about the people that they serve. 

This is why we need to move this process forward and get this state working again. 

I have been asked a lot over the past week about what happens next.  Well, I’m an optimist.  I believe that after our budget repair bill passes, tempers will cool, and we will find a way to continue to work together to help grow our economy.  We will position Wisconsin to emerge from this economic downturn stronger than ever, with new opportunities for our workers and our families.

You see, for six weeks we worked together to pass bill after bill to show that Wisconsin is open for business.  Most of our legislation received bipartisan support.  It is my belief that we will soon get back to that type of cooperation in the Capitol.

We introduced a budget repair bill that is the first step toward addressing the long-term challenges facing our state - while laying the foundation for economic growth.  The biennial budget I introduce today is built on the savings supplied by our budget repair bill – legislation, I might add, that we have already modified to address concerns expressed at the public hearing.

We need the savings in the budget repair bill because Wisconsin faces a $3.6 billion deficit.  Too many politicians have failed to tell the truth about our financial crisis.  They left Wisconsinites in the dark about the extent of our fiscal problems.  The facts are clear: Wisconsin is broke and it’s time to start paying our bills today – so our kids are not stuck with even bigger bills tomorrow. 

This deficit did not appear overnight.  Wisconsin got here through a reliance on one-time fixes, accounting gimmicks and tax increases.    Previous governors and legislatures from both parties took money from our tobacco settlement.  They raided more than a billion dollars from the transportation fund and $200 million from the patients’ compensation fund.  They increased taxes on the sick and set up shell games to draw down additional federal funds. 

They relied on one-time federal stimulus dollars as if the money would be there forever – but it’s already gone.

Wisconsin owes Minnesota nearly $60 million and some $200 million to the patient’s compensation fund.   In short, they governed for the short-term, with an eye only on the next election – not the next generation.

While families across this state were focused on making ends meet, the state government continued to grow well beyond our taxpayers’ ability to pay.  But the time has come for us to make the tough choices necessary to put our state back on the path to prosperity.

We must work together to bring our spending in line with reality.  We were elected --not to make the easy decisions to benefit ourselves -- but to make the difficult ones that will benefit our children and grandchildren.

We need a commitment to the future so our children don’t face even more dire consequences than what we face today. Together, we will change the way government works in Wisconsin.  We will make it work for the people once again.

I have often repeated references to our state’s constitutional lesson, that it is only through frugality and moderation in government that we will see freedom and prosperity for our people. 

Our budget holds true to these principles by balancing the $3.6 billion deficit through permanent spending reductions and innovative government reforms.

Specifically, our budget reduces all funds spending by $4.2 billion, or 6.7 percent, and decreases the structural deficit by 90 percent from $2.5 billion to $250 million – the lowest structural deficit in recent history.  That’s over $2 billion we are saving from future obligations and for future generations.

That’s worth repeating.  Our budget reduces the structural deficit by 90 percent.  In fact, it is lower than the last eight budgets presented by democrats and republicans alike. 

Gone are the segregated fund raids, illegal transfers, and accounting gimmicks. Gone are the tax or fee increases. Our state cannot grow if our people are weighed down paying for a larger and larger government. A government that pays its workers unsustainable benefits that are out of line with the private sector.  We need a leaner and cleaner state government. 

As we decrease spending, we also increase flexibility so local government and state government have the tools to deal with reduced revenue.  It’s true we are reducing aid to local government by just over one and a quarter billion dollars, but we are providing almost $1.5 billion in savings through our budget repair bill.  If the 14 Senate democrats do not come home, their local communities will be forced to manage these reductions in aid without the benefit of the tools provided in the repair bill.  On the other hand, if the Senate democrats do come home, local units of government overall will actually see a net increase in revenue plus savings of more than $150 million.

Let me repeat that despite the reductions in our budget, local governments would gain $150 million overall in the next biennium – but only if the Senate is allowed to act.

While aid to local government represents the state’s largest expenditure, the state’s Medicaid program represents the area of fastest growth. Medicaid costs continue to outstrip growth in general fund revenues.  Long-term care expenditures, in particular, are growing much faster than other areas of the budget.  Coupled with the use of $1.2 billion in one-time federal funding – the state is facing an unsustainable budget challenge.  A challenge in need of a serious and long-term solution.

While maintaining services for our most vulnerable, we must also refocus those services and find efficiencies where possible.  That will mean asking some individuals to pay modest co-pays and premiums as they transition from the safety net that these programs provide to gainful employment.  This will allow those individuals to begin to transition to a time in the future when they will no longer need government support, while protecting those who need these services the most.

Just as we reform our entitlement programs for the 21st century, we must also reform our education system.  Clearly, we have to produce graduates who are able to compete - not only with their peers from Chicago or Des Moines - but also from Shanghai or Sydney.

And we must do so while we balance a $3.6 billion deficit.  That is why -- even as we reduce school aids – overall we give schools across the state the tools to make up for those reductions with even greater savings through the budget repair bill. 

Again, this is why it is so vitally important for the Senate democrats to come back and do their jobs.  If they do not, our schools face massive layoffs of teachers.  However, if they do come back, overall savings for schools across the state will outweigh reductions, ultimately allowing schools to put more money in the classroom.

When I campaigned for Governor, I set as a goal that all Wisconsin third graders should be able to read at the 3rd grade level.  Many have noted that from Kindergarten to 3rd grade -- our kids learn to read -- and then from 3rd grade on, they use reading to learn.  We need to make sure every child can read as they move on from 3rd grade. 

That’s why my budget creates a third grade reading initiative that will require all third graders to achieve basic literacy.  I know we can do this and we owe it to our students to make sure we do.

In addition, we will expand choice and charter programs to insure that every kid gets a great education – no matter what zip code they live in.  We lift the cap on the number of students eligible to participate in the Milwaukee parental choice program and phase out the income eligibility limits.  And across the state, we allow any University of Wisconsin system four-year campus to create a charter school.

Competing globally also means enhancing higher education.  To do this we will give our flagship, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the tools it needs to remain a world leader in research and instruction - while continuing to be a driver of economic development for our state.  This is a decision that we discussed at length with Chancellor Biddy Martin and the leadership at UW.  For the past several years, she and other UW leaders have pushed for greater flexibility.  Now they will have it and soon the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee will as well. 

Throughout the budget process I am open to working with lawmakers from both political parties on expanding this concept to the other campuses throughout the University of Wisconsin system.  A few weeks ago, I met with all of the UW chancellors and expressed my willingness to work with them and the members of the Legislature to improve our higher education system. 

We also remain committed to keeping our university system accessible to every Wisconsin student, regardless of financial resources.  That’s why – even in these tough fiscal times - we maintain our commitment to the state’s financial aid program.  Plus, we maintain the state’s tuition reimbursement for our veterans.

As we refocus government, public safety remains a priority.  Our budget will restore truth in sentencing by repealing the early release program approved by the last administration. 

We will provide additional resources and positions in our DNA lab to assist our criminal investigations.  And we will make sure that our children -- those that are dearest to us -- are protected from those who would do them harm.  We provide additional resources to investigate on-line predators targeting our children.  The state currently has over twenty thousand IP addresses of people who prey on our children, but we didn’t have the resources to track those criminals down.  Now we will. 

We are proud of the leadership being provided in this area by our Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen and I am thankful that even with a tough budget, we can find resources to protect our kids. 

This is a reform budget.  It is about getting Wisconsin working again – and to make that happen, we need a balanced budget that works -- and an environment where the private sector can create 250,000 jobs over the next four years. 

During our special session on jobs, we created a public-private agency, the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation  that will focus solely on job creation.  Our budget includes the resources and the organization to get the WEDC working to stimulate our economy. 

Working hand in hand with our new public-private efforts at the state level, are seven regional economic development efforts around the state.   In this budget, these regional economic drivers continue to receive financial support as they collaborate to get their regions and our state growing again.

Our budget also recognizes the important role that transportation plays in economic development.  In order to grow, we need to move goods and people in a cost-effective and timely manner.  That is why our budget ends the raids on the transportation fund, and includes a total investment of $5.7 billion in our state’s transportation system. 

That’s money that will create jobs - now - and in the future.  Included in our budget is funding for the accelerated reconstruction of the Zoo interchange (which actually saves us $600 million from the original plans) and additional funding to continue construction of the I-94 corridor.  It also includes major investments in our transportation system all across the State of Wisconsin. 

We will also encourage job growth as I fulfill a campaign promise to lower taxes on those who invest in Wisconsin-based businesses and do so for an extended period of time.  We will do this by eliminating the capital gains tax for investors in Wisconsin companies that provide jobs for our people.  And we include tax relief for employers who hire more people to work in our state. 

In this budget, we provide real tax relief for homeowners across the state by implementing property tax reform that locks in property tax levies at the local level.  Time and time again, I’ve heard from Wisconsinites who are doing more with less and making sacrifices to keep their families going.  Good people like the retired couple on a fixed income or the new parents paying for daycare and the mortgage on their first house or the middle-class working family where mom and dad still have jobs, but keeping them meant taking a pay freeze.  All of them, and others like them across Wisconsin, need true property tax relief and this budget delivers. 

I campaigned on creating an environment where the private sector can create 250,000 jobs over the next four years.  Our budget lays that foundation, by freeing taxpayers to create jobs in the private sector, by limiting the size and scope of government, and by focusing our government on meeting core priorities.  Where we must make reductions, we do so wisely, by giving local governments the tools to save even more money than overall reductions in state aid.

As I have said before, our constitution says, “the blessings of a free government can only be maintained by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality and virtue.”

This is the heart of our budget.  We are returning to frugality and are making the long term decisions to balance our budget now -- and more importantly, into the future.  We will do the heavy lifting to protect our children and grandchildren from having to make the hard decisions that were once avoided.

I know that things will get better. 

Back in the 1980s – when I was growing up in the small town of Delavan – we faced similar circumstances in our state.  A tough economy and a tight budget were the top issues 25 years ago.

Tommy Thompson brought into office bold new ideas and strong leadership.  At the time, defenders of the status quo took offense.  But by the end of his first term, those reforms helped balance the budget and those policies helped the private sector create 258,000 new jobs.  I remember Governor Thompsons’ optimism and the excitement he created when we turned our state around back then.  If we did it a generation ago, we can do it again today.

 This budget is about our commitment to the future.  Like every parent and grandparent in this state, I want my two sons to grow up in a Wisconsin (at least) as great as the Wisconsin I grew up in.  Working together, I know we can do it. 

Thank you.  May God richly bless you and your family.  And may God continue to bless the great State of Wisconsin. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Muskego Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 12:08 am
Wow, where to start with this collection of 1/2 truths and complete fabrications.
1. I'm a working Wisconsonite too so I'm not sure what your point is. Then again, so are the teachers, nurses, social workers, firefighters and police officers who recognize a power grab when they see one. 2. Your conception of America is a race to the bottom. While the richest 1% of the country have gobbled up 23% more wealth over the last 20 years, working people have seen wages stagnate. Perhaps if we had a rational discussion of the merits. of sound fiscal policy, one based on facts rather than ideology, we might recognize the shortcomings of Gov. Walker's proposals. 3. Prior to taking office, the state unions offered $100 million in give-backs and concessions. Walker begged and pleaded with the Assembly and Senate not to pass it. They acquiesced. But what it turned out Walker wanted was to break the unions. His interests are around ensuring that the GOP have a stronger funding base for the 2012 elections by making it harder for Democrats to raise funds from union contributions. 4. Collective bargaining is a right of workers who form unions. Walker wants to take that away. The 14 who fled the state to prevent Walker's tyrannical power-grab will be remembered as heroes of the labor movement. A movement which Walker has, inadvertently, reawakened. 5. And Scott Walker's assertion that he told us what he was going to do was rated FALSE by the Journal-Sentinel's PolitiFact group.
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 12:11 am
Why is a 3% tax increase on the wealthiest 1% of Americans "socialism" but a 14% pay cut for teachers, nurses and social workers a "shared sacrifice?" Hypocrisy, thy name is Republican.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 12:18 am
1. I'm a working Wisconsonite too so I'm not sure what your point is. - My point is that, as a working Wisconsinite I've had to endure some cuts due to the state of the economy. Over the past 3 years, 20% in fact. I'm not alone in that regard. Time for the public employees to take some of that on as well.
2. Your conception of America is a race to the bottom. - America competes in a global market now. There's no getting around that and no denying it. It is what it is. I've had to make concessions as have many others. Again, time for some equity. 3. Prior to taking office, the state unions offered $100 million in give-backs and concessions. Walker begged and pleaded with the Assembly and Senate not to pass it. They acquiesced. - Then why point the finger soley at Walker? It was controlled by Democrats at the time. How about you give them some credit for disappointing you and heaping the burden on "working Wisconsinites as well? 4. Collective bargaining is a right of workers who form unions. - Federal union employees don't have ANY collective bargaining rights - not even those Walker is willing to maintain. Why aren't you carping at the Obama administration for doing nothing about that? 5. And Scott Walker's assertion that he told us what he was going to do was rated FALSE by the Journal-Sentinel's PolitiFact group. He said he was going to balance budget. Obama didn't mention "Cash for Clunkers" either - you gonna hold that against him?
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 12:23 am
Fine by me. Is a 3% tax increase on the wealthiest 1% of Americans going to bring things in line enough so that all those public employees who haven't had to make any sacrifices up 'til now don't have to? Not on your life. But they're doing everything within their power, with an assist from our "brave" senate Dems to make sure they don't. But you're okay with that.
There's your hypocrisy.
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 12:31 am
1. I'm sorry you've had a lessening of income. But that's hardly the fault of the public sector workers the Republicans seek to demonize through this process. Phrases like "Time for the public employees to take some of that on as well" make no sense given they already offered every financial concession Walker wanted. So that issue is moot.
2. See #1, because you have had a hard time, so should everyone else. Of course if you were in a union, that might not be true. 3. I do blame the Democrats for not passing it. One in particular: Senate Majority Leader Russ Decker who voted AGAINST the labor contract 4. Whatever fed employees have or don't have is irrelevant to the rights of Wisconsin STATE workers. States rights and all notwithstanding, your point is, well, pointless 5. So when you can't answer for Walker's dishonesty you bring in Obama? How about sticking to the subject at hand.
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 12:37 am
If you can tear yourself away from Fox News long enough, let me try to make this clear for you. THE WORKERS ALREADY CONCEDED TO ALL OF WALKER'S FISCAL REQUESTS. All of them. All the givebacks he asked for. Every one. What they are objecting to is his attempt to STRIP AWAY THEIR RIGHTS. This is NOT ABOUT MONEY. It never has been about money. It's about undermining public sector (and eventually private sector) unions.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 12:51 am
Walker explained the need to reduce certain portions of the collective bargaining rights. If you can settle down for a moment and actually listen to the reasoning, it makes sense. Particularly in light of the budget cuts that are coming down the pike. We can't afford to go through the 3 ring circus we are now every time there's a need to make changes due to budget constraints. It's not about undermining unions, and certainly has absolutely nothing to do with private sector unions.
But since you brought them up, one of the reasons I had to take 20% cut when our company needed to make those cuts at the time was because our production workers were unionized, refused to open negotiations and ultimately refused to accept any kind of wage cut. Don't preach to me about unions. I've had enough experience with them over my life time. They promote mediocrity, preserve the jobs of the incompetent and, as noted here, can't see any further than their own personal benefit when it comes to the health of the company as a whole.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 12:58 am
1. I'm sorry you've had a lessening of income. But that's hardly the fault of the public sector workers the Republicans seek to demonize through this process. Phrases like "Time for the public employees to take some of that on as well" make no sense given they already offered every financial concession Walker wanted. So that issue is moot. - Not moot unless we want to go through this charade every time we have to adjust to meet budgets. Unless you want to encourage layoffs. If you offer no way out of a tough budget situation other than layoffs, that's what you'll get.
2. See #1, because you have had a hard time, so should everyone else. Of course if you were in a union, that might not be true. - See my experience with unions above. Had everyone been in the union, there's a very good chance that the branch would have been shut down. And unfortunately, when my salary goes down, so does the percentage of that salary that goes to taxes. Is it fair that I take an even greater tax hit on top of my reduced wages to support public employees who think they're in a position where they don't have to share the burden until they're pushed to the wall? 3. I do blame the Democrats for not passing it. One in particular: Senate Majority Leader Russ Decker who voted AGAINST the labor contract. - Then where's the railing on them until I mentioned it?
scotch March 2, 2011 at 01:03 am
Bob, the wheels are in motion. Walker is holding fast and the whole nation is holding it's breath.
What those that can't see past their personal wallet and ideology is that even if the PUBLIC sector Union wins, they lose. The well is all but dry. If CB isn't removed the public sector Unions will suck what's left out of the private sector, where all of their wealth resides.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 01:03 am
4. Whatever fed employees have or don't have is irrelevant to the rights of Wisconsin STATE workers. States rights and all notwithstanding, your point is, well, pointless. - Not at all. It proves that unions can survive and thrive w/o collective bargaining.
5. So when you can't answer for Walker's dishonesty you bring in Obama? How about sticking to the subject at hand. - The subject at hand is the details, not dishonesty. Did Walker say he was NOT going to reduce the ability of unions to collectively bargain. If so, show me where he said that? Walker was, and is, a known quantity. If you live in Milwaukee County, you shouldn't be surprised by any of it. The Obama comparison is purposely ludicrous, but gets to the point. Everyone knew what Walker's agenda was and how he may go about achieving it. Including the majority that voted him into office. If you don't like what you got, get out the vote next time and maybe you'll get what you want then.
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 01:07 am
I don't see the connection between the collective bargaining process as it applies to benefits and working conditions. And frankly, it doesn't make sense. I'm not normally a believer in conspiracies. Most politicians aren't smart enough to hatch conspiracies... But in this case, the whiff of conspiracy is wafting from Madison. As part of his 2012 Republican Presidential Playbook, Karl Rove outlined a plan to defund the Democratic party by undermining the unions, both public and private sector. This is what is happening in Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio. Why else would Walker seek to eliminate the state collection of union dues and to force an annual re-certification of the unions? He's running a playbook written for him by the nation GOP leadership.
As for the private sector unions, they've done a lot on their own to undermine their own positions. But I think we'll see a resurgence now that so many people are outraged at Walker's conduct. He's managed to get 61% of Americans to side with the union. I didn't think that'd be possible. But on the whole, unions do a lot to stabilize and improve the living conditions of their members. The real source of Wisconsin's (and the nation's) financial crisis is rooted in an acre of land at the tip of lower Manhattan. The fraud and corruption of Wall Street are being laid on the backs of the public sector workers because they make an easy target. Let's put the blame for our financial situation where it belongs. Not on the teachers.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 01:19 am
I'll try to explain. But in order to do so I'm going to ask you to look around here for an article about Shorewood's recent settling of their 20 some odd month long "collective bargaining" with the teachers union. In that article, you'll see that this contract, like a number of them just coincidentally settled during this whole episode, includes a 3.13% overall compensation per year over the term of the contract. Now think about that in relation to the stated claims that they were willing to make concessions. Is that a concession? If they're true to their promise, did they bargain in good faith? I don't know how you could answer yes to that to be honest.
With collective bargaining left in place, not only are we now stuck with that agreement that goes directly against what the unions said they would do, but there's no way for the communities that agreed to those contracts prior to do anything about them in light of the budget decreases coming down the pike. Now you can say shame on the community negotiators for accepting those agreements, but the bottom line is that the unions can't be trusted to stick to their word or NOT exercise the collective bargaining agreement to do exactly the opposite of what they say they're going to do. And municipalities can't afford to be held hostage for 20 months or so trying to hash out an agreement while the shortfalls pile up.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 01:27 am
The real source of this country's economic woes lies on the other side of the planet. Once they decided they wanted to be a player, the whole game changed. We have no control over that unless we want to enforce protectionist policy so strict that we self-destruct as a nation. It got it's foothold in the mid-90s, a time when TPTB were seriously suggesting that it was actually a good thing as it freed up our people to be innovators. People were inhaling too many fumes wafting in from Silicon Valley at the time. We were going to be a nation of dot-com millionaires - remember that?
Obviously that didn't pan out, had very little to do with Wall Street or any particular segment of the economy attempting to profit off of the backs of anyone else. We collectively snowed ourselves into believing there was no way to go but up. And now we pay the price. Collectively. Bargained or not.
Cathryn March 2, 2011 at 01:41 am
Bitter....aren't we Bob? Hope you don't have any children or grandchildren in the Public schools of Wisconsin because Walker's $900 million dollar cut is going to hurt the kids the worst. But....oh yes.... the Repair Bill is the tool the local districts can use to deal with the shortages. What a crock!!!!
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 01:45 am
I don't disagree with you that the Chinese are a serious economic threat to us. But to ignore the culpability of the financial industry is to turn a blind eye to the vampire in our midst. And it's not a nice vampire like Twilight, but a nasty blood sucking demon.
Matt Taibbi has done a series of articles for Rolling Stone which do an excellent job at peeling back the layers of greed and corruption, mostly around Goldman Sachs. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wall-streets-bailout-hustle-20100217 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/looting-main-street-20100331 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wall-streets-naked-swindle-20100405 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-feds-vs-goldman-20100426 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 01:47 am
So class sizes go up and a few other things have to change. Deal with it, we all are. It's not like you're going to roll up to school and it's going to be boarded up and teachers are going to be selling apples on the corners.
Times are tough all around. I've had to change the way I do things personally. Are you telling me that the administrators in your district can find absolutely NO way to reduce costs? If that's the case, then you need new administrators. Ones who will use the tools they're given to assure that you and the rest of the taxpaying public are getting the best they can for the budget within which they have to operate.
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 01:48 am
It just amazes me that people can convince themselves that the middle class has to saddle this entire burdon because we can't talk seriously about the source of the problem (Wall Street) and the solution (repeal the Bush tax cuts and raise taxes on the top 1%).
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 01:51 am
A joke to lighten things up!
A public employee, a tea partier, and a CEO are sitting at a table. In the middle of the table sits a plate of a dozen cookies. The CEO reaches across, takes 11 cookies, looks at the tea partier, and says, “Look out for that public employee, he wants a piece of your cookie.”
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 01:56 am
Phil, I understand the wall street thing and dot.com thing and all the other things that have happened and I realize it makes everyone feel better if they can find some greedy rich guy to blame rather than examine their own culpability and responsibility in this mess, but the bottom line is that, in terms of the most cataclysmic change that's occurred in the past 20 years from an economic standpoint, it's the rise of the East. For awhile we forestalled some of that effect by remaining distributors of product produced elsewhere. Now much of that distribution has gone that way as well. We're on the verge of losing control of everything and having our companies over here be nothing more than marketing arms of foreign owned entities (think Lenova, for instance. Get ready for Cherry). We have no plan in place. About the best we can hope for is that the Chinese demand a better standard of living and somebody figures out how to get them to adjust the value of their currency.
BTW, if any of your union pals would like to head over there to attempt to unionize, have at it. They could actually use it and it might level the playing field. Then again, if you think Walker plays tough with unions...
Phil Scarr March 2, 2011 at 02:03 am
I think we're pretty close on this. We need the Federal government to do two things. First, make it harder to outsource jobs and second, tax revenue generated outside the US for companies operating in the US.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 02:08 am
Phil, we gotta cut some costs here, period. We can't just continue to look to taxing to fix everything. It never stops. Nobody is ever willing to give up anything. Sure, tax that guy but don't you dare take away any of what I'm making, even if it is out of line with what the rest of those folks in the middle class are making.
If you did what you said (repealed the Bush "tax cuts" and taxed the people in WI who fall into that top 1%), you're still not going to make up for the shortfall. You're still going to have to make cuts. But again, I have to ask. I've taken the hit (and a hard one, thanks, in part to the union component of the business in question). Why should I take a further hit (higher taxes to support an inflexible public workforce) and the public employees take none, particularly in light of some of the VERY generous compensation packages they have. How exactly is that fair?
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 02:17 am
Phil,
I've had this argument before. Have you ever noticed that just about every time the government jumps into the social engineering field, it leaves a gaping hole that someone much smarter and faster figures out how to exploit? I'll guarantee whatever the government tries to do in this regard will do just that. Leave a gaping loophole that will ultimately end up hurting us more than helping us. It's just not that simple to "make it harder to outsource jobs" and "tax revenue generated outside the US for companies operating in the US". By the time you could actually get the legislation in place, you won't have anymore "revenue generated outside the US for companies operating in the US". The best and brightest are not in the US Government. They're the ones you're complaining about on Wall Street. It's out of our hands. Nobody wants to admit it, but it is. Any protectionist policy at this point is only going to hurry the demise. Whose the largest holder of Government debt (aside from the US taxpayer) Phil? You want them to call in that ticket? Let the protectionism begin.
D.D. March 2, 2011 at 03:10 am
This is what happens when we have 10 years+ of poor leadership at the State level. From Tommy through Doyle (3 different governors) failed to make good fiscal choices. Now we have sold off our tobacco settlement, used 1 time stimulus, increased taxes by billions (Doyle over $1Billion plus the huge property tax increases this state as seen), nearly chased away multiple manufacturers with combined reporting...etc. I hear the statements that we should just increase taxes on corporations... sure, and you can go ahead and then put away your "We want GOOD JOBS NOW" signs. People need to understand that we are not only competing with China, we are competing with other states. Raising taxes would only increase operating costs in Wisconsin... companies with any choice will either take that tax increase out of their Wisconsin worker saleries (thus decreasing tax revenue) or move the jobs out of state. We have to compete in the real world, not the world we wish we lived in.
Aj Randall March 2, 2011 at 03:18 am
What a great debate. Both Bob and Phil are able to be polite (semi) and both have educated answers. This is what I LOVE about America. It's nice to see at least a few people have bothered to collect facts and are able to articulate their thoughts in meaningful manner. Even though one of you is dead wrong...it's still good to hear EVERYONE'S thoughts.
Ben Hogan March 2, 2011 at 04:13 am
If you disagree with the elimination of collective bargaining. I suggest you read an article by Robert Costrell of the Wall Street Journal. He does a great job explaining why collective bargaining has gotten us to the situation we are in. Here is a link.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703408604576164290717724956.html
Ben Hogan March 2, 2011 at 04:15 am
Did you read the article Phil? This is why collective bargaining needs to go.
Greta Mueller March 2, 2011 at 12:40 pm
Cathryn - it is! Let's have a real-life example. The village contributes about $1.1 million to employee pensions a year over and above salaries. (Note, I'm rounding off a little to make the illustration easier) We receive close to $1 million a year in state shared revenue. I don't know the numbers yet, but let's say we see a reduction of 40% in state shared revenue via Walker's budget, that equates to approximately $400,000. If our village trustees have the ability to obtain benefit concessions, as Walker proposed, from our employees without being hamstrung with the threat of binding arbitration, and IF police and fire are included (that's a big if and the city of Milwaukee has passed a resolution to include their safety personnel), we save over $500,000 on just the pension portion, not even taking into consideration an increase in our employee's health insurance contribution.
We come out ahead! Which also means our trustees would have the ability to readjust the percentages for less of a contribution from our employees if they felt they could still balance our budget. The formula works for all municipalities, unless there's already a large contribution to health and pension benefits in a specific area, then naturally, it won't. I'll continue since I'm running out of characters.
Bob McBride March 2, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Exactly.
And we are competing with other states for a part of a shrinking pie, as major players in many industries consolidate and downsize. Nobody WANTS this. But the fact that it exists and we don't like it doesn't mean we can just pretend it isn't happening or think if we only hold out long enough it will all go away. This is the way things are going to be for the foreseeable future in this country. States are going to be competing for a shrinking pool of private sector jobs and in order to attract them we have to be attractive to those companies that provide them. If it means (and it does) that the public sector makes concessions and changes the way IT does business to attract those jobs, then that WILL be done or you're going to see a serious exodus from here to those states who have them.
Greta Mueller March 2, 2011 at 12:51 pm
Now, why not just increase taxes? For the last four years there have been restrictions on levy increases from the state of either 2% or percentage of growth...2011 budgets were granted an exception to 3% because of the poor economy. Walker's budget restricts those levy limits to 0% or level of growth.
Based on our $13 million budget/levy, in order to mitigate a $400,000 loss, we'd need to raise taxes a little over 3% - I don't know the level of our growth this year, but I'm fairly confident it won't be 3%. The only other option is to go to referendum and ask the taxpayers to exceed state levy limits. Do you pay attention to how Caledonia residents vote on referenda involving tax increases? We, in all of Racine County, vote NO more than just about anyone else. So, the option remaining is cut bodies and services. Well, as I mentioned before, we're already down in those numbers, how much more can Caledonia cut and still provide the level of service to which we've become accustomed? These are the same decisions cities and school boards all over the state will face. Walker gives them the tools to balance their budgets - if they choose to ignore them, blame your local officials and school board members, not the Walker budget.
Heather in Caledonia March 2, 2011 at 01:30 pm
One thing I'm very excited for - lifting the cap on virtual schools! It's not mentioned in his speech, but I've heard that it is included in this. Also, by lifting regulations one schools (lifting cap on charter schools, allowing more to participate in Milwaukee's program, removing requirement that teachers need BS from "Teaching School" etc.)... there is hope there.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Gail @ Curves June 12, 2013 at 07:27 pm
Yes, Muskego has great businesses! We also have a great Executive Director -- Tina Weiss -- who weRead More can thank for much of the Chamber's growth, as well as our own.
Matty's Fish Fry at Muskego Tire & Auto
Scandihovian Lady June 6, 2013 at 09:46 am
Heritage Presbyterian Church and Denoon Saloon will be located in front of North Shore Bank. TheyRead More will be taking advantage of the $1 menu item with Denoon Saloon selling Pulled Pork Sandwiches and Heritage Church selling large, icy cold Pickles-On-A-Stick, a nice accompaniment to the Pulled Pork Sandwiches. Hope you will stop by and buy some!
Dr. Jodie June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
'Addicting Pretzels' was a big hit at the Animal Doctor Holistic Veterinary Complex! They will beRead More back again in July and August, along with the $1 root beer floats to wash them down!